Visual C++ has a few more features (there is a 2010 version btw) and is optimized to make especially windows programming easier. However, that also means it has quite a few features that may confuse the new programmer, or lead them astray with features that require some knowledge about how they work.
Code::Blocks is not quite as heavily loaded with features, though you are unlikely to miss anything using it. It also has the advantage to be available on multiple platforms and it supports multiple compilers. It also has built-in support for wxWidgets (a quite nice platform independent GUI system). My only real complaint with it til now is that it's code completition system is not quite as sophisticated as Microsofts IntelliSense. C::B is what I personally use.
You could also use Eclipse, but I don't really have any experience with it.
PS: At the beginning, you won't need an IDE at all. Just a compiler and a text editor will do- doing stuff from the command line at the start will give you a feeling what exactly linking and compiling is, later you can move on to IDE's which will do all that annoying work for you. Thing is, just cause IDE's can do it for you doesn't mean you don't need to know what exactly is going on.
Code::Blocks is not quite as heavily loaded with features, though you are unlikely to miss anything using it. It also has the advantage to be available on multiple platforms and it supports multiple compilers. It also has built-in support for wxWidgets (a quite nice platform independent GUI system). My only real complaint with it til now is that it's code completition system is not quite as sophisticated as Microsofts IntelliSense. C::B is what I personally use.
You could also use Eclipse, but I don't really have any experience with it.
PS: At the beginning, you won't need an IDE at all. Just a compiler and a text editor will do- doing stuff from the command line at the start will give you a feeling what exactly linking and compiling is, later you can move on to IDE's which will do all that annoying work for you. Thing is, just cause IDE's can do it for you doesn't mean you don't need to know what exactly is going on.
Codeblocks Vs Visual Studio Code
Vs Code Vs Visual Studio
Dev C++ Vs Code Blocks Vs Visual Studio 2017
Auto tune plug in for cakewalk. Jan 10, 2009 Thus far I have tried Borland, MS Visual Studio 2008 Express Edition, and Dev-C. Vienna instruments vst free download. Download korg m1 vst free 2016. I didn't like Borland at all. I felt the interface was cumbersom to use. Also, the editor did not indent as I wanted. And the straw that broke the camels back was that code I had written that worked on MS VS 2008 ED and Dev-C didn't always work on Borland. When comparing Code::Blocks vs Visual Studio Code, the Slant community recommends Code::Blocks for most people. In the question“What are the best IDEs for C on Windows?” Code::Blocks is ranked 1st while Visual Studio Code is ranked 6th. Sep 17, 2017 In this episode we installed Microsoft Visual Studio and CodeBlocks and we compiled C in the both software. Microsoft Visual Studio: https://www.visualstud.